PRAJAPATI et al v. MAYORKAS et al
| SAKSHIBEN PRAJAPATI and YUG PRAJAPATI |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DANIEL RENAUD, MERRICK GARLAND and TRACY RENAUD |
| 5:2023cv00500 |
| December 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| TILMAN E SELF |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Letter regarding acceptance of service from UNITED STATES ATTORNEY - CIVIL PROCESS CLERK. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sst) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DANIEL RENAUD, TRACY RENAUD, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons DANIEL RENAUD, #2 Summons TRACY RENAUD, #3 Summons US ATTORNEY GENERAL, #4 Summons U.S ATTORNEY (CIVIL PROCESS CLERK))(ggs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4522021, $405 filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet, #2 Summons Alejandro Mayorkas, #3 Summons Daniel Renaud, #4 Summons Merrick Garland, #5 Summons Tracy Renaud, #6 Summons U.S. Atty MDGA, #7 Exhibit I-918 receipt, #8 Exhibit I-918A receipt, #9 Exhibit I-918A receipt, #10 Exhibit USCIS Policy Memo, #11 Exhibit I-765 receipt, #12 Exhibit I-765 receipt)(CHAUDHARY, BHAVYA) |
| US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE no longer assigned to case. (ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
