VINSON v. GARLAND
| JASON MORGAN VINSON |
| MERRICK GARLAND, JOY ODOM, MARC T TREADWELL, DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE GEORGIA DISTRICT, GARY LONG and BUTTS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER |
| 5:2024cv00063 |
| February 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| TILMAN E SELF |
| CHARLES H WEIGLE |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and ORDER to Recast Petition re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JASON MORGAN VINSON. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 4/17/24. (sst)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 2/21/24. (sst)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by JASON MORGAN VINSON. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(sst) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ( Filing fee $ 5 Receipt number 50005464.),filed by JASON MORGAN VINSON. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 State of Georgia, #3 Memorandum in Support, #4 List of Parties, #5 Certificate of Service)(sst) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
