PATEL et al v. JADDOU
| RAKESHKUMAR BALDEVBHAI PATEL and SUBHADRABEN R. PATEL |
| UR M. JADDOU |
| 5:2024cv00143 |
| May 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| TILMAN E SELF |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to UR M. JADDOU, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons AG, #2 summon Leary)(sst) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4647086, $405 filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons Jaddou, #3 Summons Summons Leary, #4 Summons Summons AG, #5 Exhibit A: I-918 receipt, #6 Exhibit B: I-918A receipts, #7 Exhibit C: Processing Time Report)(DIAZ, LESLIE) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by RAKESHKUMAR BALDEVBHAI PATEL, SUBHADRABEN R. PATEL ); Document must be re-filed, the exhibit list need to be attached as an attachment and include a description. A generic identifier such as Exhibit A or Exhibit 1 is not acceptable. An example of a properly identified attachment would be Exhibit A Letter from A. Hamilton to A. Burr. See CM/ECF Administrative Procedures.(sst) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
