DAILEY v. JESTER et al
| JAMES MONROE DAILEY |
| WARDEN TEKETA JESTER, BALDWIN STATE PRISON, JOHN AND OR JANE DOES 1-10, NURSE RUSS, NURSE OJ and NURSE NEWMAN |
| 5:2026cv00007 |
| January 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| ALFREDA L SHEPPARD |
| MARC T TREADWELL |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee Paid: IFP Denied $405, Receipt No. 500013753. (elp) |
Filing 6
ORDER denying #2 and #4 Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALFREDA L SHEPPARD on 2/17/2026. (rsa)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE for Funds to be Deducted from Prison Account Filed by JAMES MONROE DAILEY. (Attachments: #1 Account Certification, #2 Envelope). (rka) Modified on 2/10/2026 to edit docket text (rka). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (rka)
|
| Case ASSIGNED to US MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALFREDA L SHEPPARD.. Motion(s) referred to ALFREDA L SHEPPARD.(rka) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by JAMES MONROE DAILEY. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter in reference to Motion to IFP)(rka) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by JAMES MONROE DAILEY (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rka) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
