SHUBERT et al v. ADT SOLAR LLC et al
| NAVARSHA L. SHUBERT and ISAAC L. SHUBERT, JR. |
| FIFTH THIRD BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ENPHASE ENERGY INC, ADT INC, SUNPRO SOLAR LLC and ADT SOLAR LLC |
| 5:2026cv00524 |
| November 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| C ASHLEY ROYAL |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Jurisdictional Statement by ENPHASE ENERGY INC (MCKINNON, JANINE) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ENPHASE ENERGY INC identifying Other Affiliate BLACKROCK INC. for ENPHASE ENERGY INC. (MCKINNON, JANINE) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against All Plaintiffs Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-5467143, $405 filed by ENPHASE ENERGY INC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Pleadings & Filings, #2 Exhibit Enphase Energy Proof of Citizenship, #3 Exhibit ADT Solar Proof of Citizenship, #4 Exhibit Sunpro Solar Business Profile, #5 Exhibit ADT Inc. Proof of Citizenship, #6 Exhibit Fifth Third Bank Proof of Citizenship, #7 Exhibit Co-Defendant Consent to Removal, #8 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #9 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) All parties must refile pending motions from the court of origin in this new case.(MCKINNON, JANINE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
