Thomas v. HUBTEX Maschinenbau GmbH & Co KG
| 7:2006cv00081 |
| August 29, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Valdosta Office |
| Hugh Lawson |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
ORDER denying 126 Motion in Limine; denying 127 Motion to Quash; denying 128 Motion in Limine; denying 129 Motion to Quash; denying 132 Motion in Limine. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 3/10/2009. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER finding as moot 79 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 81 Motion to Quash; finding as moot 82 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 83 Motion to Quash; granting in part and denying in part 86 Motion in Limine; denying 87 Motion in Limine; deferring ruling on 88 Motion in Limine; denying 89 Motion in Limine; granting 90 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 100 Motion in Limine. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 2/26/2009. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Strike ; denying 26 Motion to Strike. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 9/23/2008. (nbp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thomas v. HUBTEX Maschinenbau GmbH & Co KG | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
