Wood et al v. Archbold Medical Center, Inc. et al
| Mark G. Wood |
| Archbold Medical Center Inc, John D. Archbold Memorial Hospital, Inc., Ken B. Beverly, James L. Story, Jr., Marshall Dunaway, Merrill Hicks, Raul G. Santos, Mel Hartsfield, Victor M. McMillan, Edward Hall, Nicholas Quinif, Wesley W. Simms, Rudolf Hehn, James Falconer, Bryan R. Grieme and Other Unnamed Co-conspirators |
| William A Thompson, TPA Captive Insurance Company Inc, Quincy Dialysis, Tallahassee Dialysis, West Tallahassee Dialysis, Tallahassee South, Madison Four-Freedom, McGuireWoods LLP and Robert J Pristave |
| Quincy Dialysis, Draffin & Tucker, C.P.A. and Sewell, Morgan & Hilliard, P.C. |
| Mel Hartsfield, Archbold Medical Center Inc, John D. Archbold Memorial Hospital, Inc. and James L. Story, Jr. |
| Mark G. Wood |
| 7:2007cv00109 |
| October 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Valdosta Office |
| Hugh Lawson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
587
ORDER for status report as to 561 Motion for Attorney's Fees. Counsel to notify Court in writing not later than 5/31/2011. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 5/23/2011. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
572
ORDER notifying parties of briefing schedules. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 10/6/2010. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
554
ORDER granting 462 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 464 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 466 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 468 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 472 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 500 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 9/13/2010. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
544
ORDER denying 517 Motion to Strike. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 8/3/2010. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
488
ORDER denying 482 Motion to Seal Document ; denying 484 Motion to Seal Document; rescinding Court's 185 Order. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 10/14/2009. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
481
ORDER advising parties only the pending dispositive motions will be entertained by the Court. Any amendments to pending motions must be filed no later than 10/14/2009. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 10/9/2009. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
477
ORDER denying 473 Motion to Seal Document. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 10/8/2009. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
457
ORDER granting 432 Motion to Compel. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 09/17/09. (mbh)
|
|
Filing
390
ORDER finding as moot 224 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 234 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 244 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 245 Motion to Compel; denying 249 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 255 Motion for Extension of Time; finding as moot 259 Motion for Extension of Time; granting 267 Motion to Quash; granting 268 Motion to Quash; granting 269 Motion to Quash; finding as moot 280 Sealed Motion; withdrawing 281 Sealed Motion; withdrawing 283 Motion for Pro tective Order; finding as moot 287 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 289 Motion for Hearing; withdrawing 295 Motion for Extension of Time; granting 297 Sealed Motion; denying 312 Motion to Quash; denying 322 Motion to Strike ; denying [32 4] Motion for Protective Order; denying 336 Motion to Strike ; granting 345 Sealed Motion; finding as moot 351 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; finding as moot 364 Motion for Leave to File; finding as moot 386 Motion for Leave to File. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 6/18/2009. (nbp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
