HUTCHINSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
LISA HUTCHINSON and R ANTHONY HUTCHINSON |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
7:2011cv00131 |
September 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Valdosta Office |
Lowndes |
Hugh Lawson |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ORDER: Findings of facts and conclusions of law following 4/2/2013 bench trial. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 4/8/2013. (nbp) |
Filing 51 ORDER denying 33 Motion in Limine. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 3/11/2013. (nbp) |
Filing 36 ORDER setting expedited briefing schedule for 33 Motion in Limine. Response due no later than 3/4/2013; reply due no later than 3/8/2013 at 12:00 noon. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 2/27/2013. (nbp) |
Filing 32 ORDER notifying parties that case will be tried in April by the Court. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 2/15/2013. (nbp) |
Filing 29 ORDER requiring parties to file status report regarding mediation. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on February 13, 2013. (mbh) |
Filing 24 ORDER granting 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 6/18/2012. (nbp) |
Filing 13 ORDER accepting the response of the Plaintiffs and directing case to go forward. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 2/29/2012. (nbp) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss Complaint against Defendant Stacks. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 12/16/2011. (nbp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.