Smith v. Owens et al
| DONALD FRANK SMITH |
| S. Foster, Howard Kelly, William C. Danforth, Ted Philbin, Tony Morris, Henderson and Art Singleton |
| 7:2012cv00023 |
| February 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Valdosta Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Thomas Q Langstaff |
| Hugh Lawson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER denying as untimely 52 Motion to Re-Open Order of the District Court Judge. Ordered by U.S. District Judge HUGH LAWSON on 3/4/2014. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER directing Clerk to return record, as supplemented, to the Eleventh Circuit. Ordered by U.S. District Judge HUGH LAWSON on 1/22/2014. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER directing Defendants to provide Court with information not later than 1/21/2014. Ordered by U.S. District Judge Hugh Lawson on 1/7/2014. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER denying 37 Motion for Judgment. Ordered by U.S. District Judge Hugh Lawson on 10/31/2013. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER denying 30 Motion to Set Aside Judgment; denying 31 Motion to Strike ; denying 33 Motion to Amend/Correct. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 1/18/2013. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER adopting 27 Report and Recommendations; granting 17 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 11/6/2012. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER adopting 9 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 3/27/2012. (nbp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
