BROCK et al v. ARTRAZZ INC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES et al
Plaintiff: SUSAN G BROCK and DANIEL A BROCK
Defendant: ARTRAZZ INC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, MICHAEL JW NADEAU and Zurich Insurance Company Ltd.
Case Number: 7:2012cv00034
Filed: March 1, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Valdosta Office
County: Lowndes
Presiding Judge: Hugh Lawson
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER extending expert deposition deadline to 1/13/2013; Daubert motion deadline is 1/31/2013; dispositive motion deadline is 2/15/2013. Parties to inform Court results of mediation not later than 12/15/2012. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 11/20/2012. (nbp)
October 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER memorializing the 10/11/2012 telephone conference; directing Plaintiffs to file amended reply brief re: Motion to Amend not later than 10/15/2012. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 10/12/2012. (nbp)
August 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER memorializing ruling of 8/22/12 phone conference. Dispositive motion deadline is 1/22/2013. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 8/23/2012. (nbp)
July 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting 14 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 17 Motion to Substitute. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 7/3/2012. (nbp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROCK et al v. ARTRAZZ INC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SUSAN G BROCK
Represented By: Christina L. Folsom
Represented By: William Pope Langdale, III
Represented By: William Errett Moore, Jr
Represented By: Gregory A. Voyles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DANIEL A BROCK
Represented By: Gregory A. Voyles
Represented By: William Errett Moore, Jr
Represented By: William Pope Langdale, III
Represented By: Christina L. Folsom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARTRAZZ INC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
Represented By: MICHAEL J GOLDMAN
Represented By: Brian W. Sprinkle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL JW NADEAU
Represented By: MICHAEL J GOLDMAN
Represented By: Brian W. Sprinkle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zurich Insurance Company Ltd.
Represented By: MICHAEL J GOLDMAN
Represented By: Brian W. Sprinkle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?