United States Department of Agriculture v. WANGNAR
Plaintiff: United States Department of Agriculture
Defendant: PEIR WANGNAR
Case Number: 7:2012cv00051
Filed: April 18, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Valdosta Office
County: Tift
Presiding Judge: Hugh Lawson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER replacing 4 Temporary Restraining Order with corrected name of Defendant. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 4/30/2012. (nbp)
April 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting 1 Motion for TRO. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 4/25/2012. (nbp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States Department of Agriculture v. WANGNAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States Department of Agriculture
Represented By: Hugh Randolph Aderhold, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PEIR WANGNAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?