Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Lee
Petitioner: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Respondent: William L. Lee
Case Number: 7:2012cv00149
Filed: November 6, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Valdosta Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Hugh Lawson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER replacing 34 vacated Order and granting 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by U.S. District Judge HUGH LAWSON on 1/22/2014. (nbp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Represented By: Michael Eric Ross
Represented By: Eric S Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William L. Lee
Represented By: Edward Fowler Preston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?