HALL v. FRIES et al
| CAROLYN HALL |
| ERIC FRIES, SHAWN BOSTICK, TIMMY J BARNES, Daniel Lindsay, Moultrie Police Department, Frank Lang, COLQUITT COUNTY GEORGIA SHERIFFS OFFICE and Al Whittington |
| 7:2013cv00105 |
| July 31, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Valdosta Office |
| Colquitt |
| Hugh Lawson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert; granting in part and denying in part 61 Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert; granting 85 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 89 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 115 Motion for Leave to File; denying 115 Motion to Amend/Correct Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 6/15/2015 (aks)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER finding as moot 50 Motion for Extension of Time; granting 51 Amended Motionfor Extension of Time. Ordered by U.S. District Judge HUGH LAWSON on 7/23/2014. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER directing parties to hold Rule 26 conference not later than 4/24/2014 and submit revised Scheduling/Discovery Report not later than 5/1/2014. Ordered by U.S. District Judge HUGH LAWSON on 4/10/2014. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 38 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; finding as moot 21 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Ordered by U.S. District Judge HUGH LAWSON on 4/9/2014. (nbp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
