DAVIS v. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: TROY DAVIS
Defendant: NANCY A BERRYHILL
Case Number: 7:2017cv00043
Filed: March 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Valdosta Office
County: Baker
Presiding Judge: THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF
Presiding Judge: W LOUIS SANDS
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 46 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees. (ksl)
November 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER granting 43 Motion for Attorney Fees; adopting 44 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 43) is GRANTED and Plaintiff is awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $13,525.47. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS on 11/20/2023. (ksl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DAVIS v. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TROY DAVIS
Represented By: CHARLES LEE MARTIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NANCY A BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?