LASKA v. KELLEY MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Plaintiff: JAMES LASKA
Defendant: KELLEY MANUFACTURING CO
Case Number: 7:2017cv00212
Filed: December 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Valdosta Office
County: Tift
Presiding Judge: HUGH LAWSON
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER denying 39 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 11/22/2019. (aks)
September 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 9/26/2019. (aks)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LASKA v. KELLEY MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES LASKA
Represented By: GARY R KESSLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KELLEY MANUFACTURING CO
Represented By: CALLIE D BRYAN
Represented By: ROSS H PITTMAN, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?