MCLEOD v. DUKES et al
| JERRY MCLEOD |
| JERRI DUKES, BECKY ROTHROCK, HOWELL L WATKINS II REALTY CORPORATION, HOWELL L WATKINS, II, MIKE DEWEY, JOE WHEELER, EUGENE OWEN, ED MELTON, LONNIE DOE, JOHN ULM, WILLIE CLEMMONS, QUITMAN GEORGIA, BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA, BECKY MALPUS, THOMASVILLE THOMAS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC, CHANDLER GIDDES, CHARLES DEVANE, JENNIFER GLOVER, MOULTRIE COLQUITT COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC, BILLY INGRAM, LARRY NICHOLS, ROBERT BRUCE, MARK NICHOLS, CLINT NICHOLS, TYLER NICHOLS, DAVID CROSBY, GINGER FORGIONE and JOHN or JANE DOES 1-50 |
| 7:2018cv00066 |
| April 24, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Valdosta Office |
| Brooks |
| HUGH LAWSON |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
193
ORDER denying 189 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 7/6/2022. (aks)
|
|
Filing
187
JUDGMENT dismissing this case. (rlw)
|
|
Filing
186
ORDER denying as moot 115 Motion and Application for the Court to Issue a Charging Order; denying as moot 117 Motion for Payment of Garnishment Funds; denying as moot 123 Motion for Conditional Judgment and Notice to Garnishee; denying as moot 128 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; denying as moot 129 Motion to Stay Collection Judgment and Receipt of Garnishment Proceeds from Registry of the Court; granting 137 Motion to Set Aside Judgment; denyi ng as moot 154 Motion for Disbursement of Funds; denying as moot 164 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; denying as moot 167 Motion Requesting the Court to Issue Subpoena Duces Tecum; denying as moot 168 Emergency Motion for Issuance of Subpoena ; denying as moot 170 Motion to Continue; denying as moot 171 Emergency Motion for Expedited Post Judgment Discovery and Motion to Compel; denying as moot 175 Motion for Writ of Garnishment; denying as moot 176 Motion for Writ of Garnishme nt; denying 177 Motion for Contempt and Sanctions; denying as moot 178 Motion to Quash Post-Judgment Interrogatories; denying as moot 179 Motion to Withdraw and Cancel Request for Issuance of Garnishment Applications; denying 180 Amended Motion for Contempt and Sanctions; denying 181 Amended Motion for Contempt and Sanctions. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 5/25/2022. (aks)
|
|
Filing
162
ORDER denying 156 Motion for TRO; granting 157 Motion for Hearing; granting 158 Motion to Intervene. The Court dismisses any purported garnishment proceedings against Robert Bruce Land & Cattle, LLC. The Clerk of Court is directed to return all funds deposited by Citizens National Bank of Quitman from the account of Robert Bruce Land & Cattle, LLC. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 3/10/2022. (aks)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER granting 59 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 4/2/2020. (aks)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 3 Motion for TRO; denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims for violation of his Fourth Ame ndment rights against Defendants Dewey, Wheeler, Owen, Melton, Doe, Ulm, and Clemmons shall be permitted to proceed. Plaintiff's state law conversion claims against Defendants Bruce, Mark Nichols, Clint Nichols, and Tyler Nichols shall be permitted to proceed. All of Plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 11/13/2018. (aks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
