WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMS et al
JOSEPH MICHAEL WILLIAMS, JR |
Deputy Warden ANTHONY TERRELL, Officer CHENNELL SIMMS and Warden STANLEY WILLIAMS |
7:2018cv00147 |
September 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
W LOUIS SANDS |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing fee Paid: Initial Partial Filing Fee $22.00. (rlw) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is Ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $21.83. ORDER denying #3 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 10/1/2018 (TQL) |
Filing 5 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to JOSEPH MICHAEL WILLIAMS, JR (rlw) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (rlw) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Filed by JOSEPH MICHAEL WILLIAMS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(rlw) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by JOSEPH MICHAEL WILLIAMS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement, #2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(rlw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by JOSEPH MICHAEL WILLIAMS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rlw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.