MASK v. DEWEY et al
| ROBERT IVAN MASK |
| Deputy THOMAS FRYE, TROUPVILLE WRECKER SERVICE, Sheriff MIKE DEWEY and Agent WILBUR COPE |
| 7:2018cv00183 |
| October 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| HUGH LAWSON |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Letter from Plaintiff to the Court regarding completing his obligation to pay the initial partial filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Request for Withdrawal of Inmate's Personal Funds, #2 Envelope)(sbd) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is Ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $55.11. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 12/13/2018 (TQL)
|
| Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to ROBERT IVAN MASK. (sbd) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (sbd)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by ROBERT IVAN MASK. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement, #2 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(sbd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WILBUR COPE, MIKE DEWEY, THOMAS FRYE, TROUPVILLE WRECKER SERVICE, filed by ROBERT IVAN MASK. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sbd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
