ROSEBERRY v. APPLE INC et al
| HELEN ROSEBERRY |
| APPLE INC, VERIZON and BEST BUY |
| 7:2018cv00189 |
| November 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| W LOUIS SANDS |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re #7 Order on Amended Motion, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by HELEN ROSEBERRY.(sbd) |
Filing 7
ORDER denying #2 #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must pay the full statutory filing fee with 21 days or by Wednesday, January 9, 2019 to proceed. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS on 12/19/2018. (rlw)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed IFP Amending #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by HELEN ROSEBERRY.(rlw) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint against HELEN ROSEBERRY by HELEN ROSEBERRY (rlw) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER that Plaintiff is to amend her affidavit to proceed IFP and supplement her complaint with regard to the basis of jurisdiction by 12/12/2018. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS on 11/21/2018. (rlw)
|
| Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to HELEN ROSEBERRY (rlw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by HELEN ROSEBERRY.(rlw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filed by HELEN ROSEBERRY. (rlw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
