HINES v. MOODY et al
| LEE HINES |
| STEIRING, DR MOODY, HUMPIES, BLEAKLEY, SELESSKA, STANLEY WILLIAMS and NOLES |
| 7:2018cv00205 |
| December 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| HUGH LAWSON |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by LEE HINES re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(sbd) |
Filing 6
ORDER for Plaintiff to File Prisoner Account Statement (Certified Copy). Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 1/30/2019. (TQL)
|
| Filing 5 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to LEE HINES. (sbd) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (sbd)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by LEE HINES. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(sbd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by LEE HINES. (Attachments: #1 Certification and Additional motion, #2 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(sbd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by LEE HINES. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Facts, #2 Exh. 1 - Grievance Form, #3 Exh. 2 - Grievance Response, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Envelope)(sbd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
