SMITH v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
| QUINCEY SMITH |
| JACQUELINE BUNN, TERRY E BARNARD, BRIAN OWENS, BRAXTON T COTTON, JAMES W MILLS and GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES |
| 7:2019cv00088 |
| June 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| W LOUIS SANDS |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Subpoenas Filed by QUINCEY SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(rlw) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Objection to Magistrate Judge by QUINCEY SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(rlw) |
| Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to QUINCEY SMITH (rlw) |
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (rlw)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by QUINCEY SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Account Statement, #2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(rlw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by QUINCEY SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A - Complaint, #2 Exhibits - Letter to State Board of Pardons and Paroles and Letter from State Board of Pardons and Paroles, #3 Envelope)(rlw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
