THIGPEN v. POWELL et al
RONNIE THIGPEN |
Sheriff CARLTON POWELL, LOUIS SCHOFIELD, ROBYN BARROW, Sheriff R CARLTON POWELL and ROBERT DONAVIN |
7:2019cv00176 |
October 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
W LOUIS SANDS |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel and notice that Plaintiff only has $.80 on the books right now filed by RONNIE THIGPEN. (Attachments: #1 Order for Bond, #2 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(sbd) |
![]() |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by RONNIE THIGPEN. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement, #2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(rlw) |
Filing 8 RECAST #1 Complaint against All Defendants by RONNIE THIGPEN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rlw) |
![]() |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by RONNIE THIGPEN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(rlw) |
Filing 5 RECAST #1 Complaint against CARLTON POWELL, LOUIS SCHOFIELD, ROBYN BARROW, ROBERT DONAVIN by RONNIE THIGPEN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rlw) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to RONNIE THIGPEN. (sbd) |
![]() |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CARLTON POWELL, LOUIS SCHOFIELD, filed by RONNIE THIGPEN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sbd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.