DICKERSON v. ZIRKEL et al
| TAURUS BERNARD DICKERSON |
| COII STEWART, COII SHARP, COII WILLIAMS, Lt ZIRKEL and Sgt SHARP |
| 7:2020cv00008 |
| January 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| HUGH LAWSON |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Court to Order the Defendants to Reply Filed by TAURUS BERNARD DICKERSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(rlw) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Filed by TAURUS BERNARD DICKERSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Letter to Taurus Dickerson from Southern Center for Human Rights, #2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(rlw) |
| Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to TAURUS BERNARD DICKERSON. (sbd) |
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (sbd)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by TAURUS BERNARD DICKERSON. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement, #2 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(sbd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SHARP, STEWART, WILLIAMS, ZIRKEL, SHARP, filed by TAURUS BERNARD DICKERSON. (Attachments: #1 Reference Paragraphs, Witness Statement, Grievance Documents, Movement History, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Envelope)(sbd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
