CELLCO PARTNERSHIP v. CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA et al
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP |
CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA, VIVIAN MILLER-CODY, ERIC HOWARD, SANDRA TOOLEY, ANDREW GIBBS, BEN H HORTON, CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA, JOSEPH VICKERS, TIMOTHY H CARROLL and IVY N CADLE |
7:2020cv00050 |
March 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Order granting Petition for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Petition Attached); Attorney Admission Fee Met by VINCENT G NELAN (nop) |
Filing 10 Order granting Petition for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Petition Attached); Attorney Admission Fee Met by W PATTON HAHN (nop) |
Filing 9 PETITION TO THE CLERK FOR ADMISSION TO PLEAD AND PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE by CELLCO PARTNERSHIP Attorney Admission Fee (Pro Hac Vice) paid by Receipt # AGAMDC-3455788, $100. LOCAL COUNSEL Name and Georgia Bar #: Ivy Cadle 353227. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(CADLE, IVY) |
Filing 8 PETITION TO THE CLERK FOR ADMISSION TO PLEAD AND PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE by IVY N CADLE Attorney Admission Fee (Pro Hac Vice) paid by Receipt # AGAMDC-3455724, $100. LOCAL COUNSEL Name and Georgia Bar #: Ivy Cadle 353227. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(CADLE, IVY) |
Filing 7 RULES 16/26 ORDER:Proposed Scheduling/Discovery order due by 5/29/2020. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER on 4/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Required Form)(far) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CELLCO PARTNERSHIP identifying Corporate Parent Verizon Communications Inc for CELLCO PARTNERSHIP. (CADLE, IVY) |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by CELLCO PARTNERSHIP ); Pursuant to Local Rule 87.1, all nongovernmental corporate parties must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement. Please file the required corporate disclosures immediately. (rlw) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by TIMOTHY H CARROLL, CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA, CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA, ANDREW GIBBS, BEN H HORTON, ERIC HOWARD, VIVIAN MILLER-CODY, SANDRA TOOLEY, JOSEPH VICKERS.(TANNER, TIMOTHY)Attorney TIMOTHY M TANNER added to party TIMOTHY H CARROLL(pty:dft), Attorney TIMOTHY M TANNER added to party CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA(pty:dft), Attorney TIMOTHY M TANNER added to party CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA(pty:dft), Attorney TIMOTHY M TANNER added to party ANDREW GIBBS(pty:dft), Attorney TIMOTHY M TANNER added to party BEN H HORTON(pty:dft), Attorney TIMOTHY M TANNER added to party ERIC HOWARD(pty:dft), Attorney TIMOTHY M TANNER added to party VIVIAN MILLER-CODY(pty:dft), Attorney TIMOTHY M TANNER added to party SANDRA TOOLEY(pty:dft), Attorney TIMOTHY M TANNER added to party JOSEPH VICKERS(pty:dft) |
Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (rlw) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA. (rlw) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA. (rlw) |
Case REASSIGNED to US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER. US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON no longer assigned to the case. (rlw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3427236, $400 filed by CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application for Zoning, #2 Exhibit Zoning Report, #3 Exhibit City's Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Case Opening Form, #5 Summons City Summons, #6 Summons City Council Summons)(CADLE, IVY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.