PLYMALE v. CHEDDARS CASUAL CAFE INC
| VALERIE PLYMALE |
| CHEDDARS CASUAL CAFE INC |
| 7:2020cv00102 |
| May 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| W LOUIS SANDS |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to CHEDDARS CASUAL CAFE INC. (sbd)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL against VALERIE PLYMALE Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3472172, $400 filed by CHEDDARS CASUALE CAFE INC (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit The Summons and Complaint to Defendant Cheddar's, #3 Exhibit Plaintiffs First Requests for Admissions, Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents to Defendant Cheddars, #4 Exhibit Plaintiffs Notice of O.C.G.A. 30(b)(6) Deposition of Defendant, #5 Exhibit General Civil/Dom Relations Case Filing Form (state court), #6 Exhibit Sheriffs Entry of Service on Defendant Cheddars, #7 Exhibit Answer of Defendant Cheddars, #8 Exhibit Defendant Cheddars 5.2 Certificate, #9 Exhibit Kimberly Sheridans Notice of Leave of Absence, #10 Exhibit Michael Beckers Notice of Leave of Absence, #11 Exhibit Defendant Cheddars 5.2 Certificate, #12 Exhibit Plaintiffs 5.2 Certificate, #13 Exhibit Plaintiffs 5.2 Certificate, #14 Exhibit Plaintiffs Notice of Serving Offer of Settlement Pursuant to O.C.G.A. 9-11-68, #15 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #16 Exhibit Answer of Defendant Cheddars to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, #17 Exhibit Plaintiffs Responses to Defendant Cheddars Requests for Admissions, #18 Exhibit Notice of Removal)(SHERIDAN, KIMBERLY)
|
|
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Notice of Removal, filed by CHEDDARS CASUAL CAFE INC ); Pursuant to Local Rule 87.1, all nongovernmental corporate parties must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement. Please file the required corporate disclosures immediately.Also, pursuant to Local Rule 87.2 a Jurisdictional Statement must be filed. (sbd)
|
|
NOTICE TO COUNSEL WILLIAM J DEGENHART - Counsel is notified that they do not show in the court records that they meet the required attorney admissions policies of this court. If within 14 days of this notice all requirements, including the payment of Pro Hac Vice or admissions fees, have not been met, a show cause hearing will be scheduled. (sbd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PLYMALE v. CHEDDARS CASUAL CAFE INC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CHEDDARS CASUAL CAFE INC | |
| Represented By: | MICHAEL MORRIS BECKER, II |
| Represented By: | KIMBERLY BLACKWELL SHERIDAN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: VALERIE PLYMALE | |
| Represented By: | WILLIAM J DEGENHART |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
