CASTILLO v PAULK
Petitioner: JOHAN CARLOS GAMEZ CASTILLO
Respondent: Mr. PAULK
Case Number: 7:2020cv00200
Filed: October 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: STEPHEN HYLES
Referring Judge: HUGH LAWSON
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE CASE. Lead Case # 7:20-cv-195. Member Case # 7:20-cv-200. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 10-8-20. (jdl)
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (rlw)
October 8, 2020 Filing 4 Case transferred in District Transfer from District of Georgia Northern; Case Number 1:20-cv-03990. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. **The Notice of Electronic Filing serves as certification for these transferred documents.**
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that this action, including all orders, motions, affidavits, pleadings, and exhibits filed herein (if any), is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, the Valdosta Division. The Clerk is DIRECTED to withdraw the referral to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 10/7/2020. (jpk) [Transferred from gand on 10/8/2020.]
October 7, 2020 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Johan Carlos Gamez Castillo re #3 Order. (jpk) [Transferred from gand on 10/8/2020.]
October 7, 2020 Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas terminated from case. (jpk) [Transferred from gand on 10/8/2020.]
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/28/20. (eop) [Transferred from gand on 10/8/2020.]
September 29, 2020 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Johan Carlos Gamez Castillo re #2 Order. (eop) [Transferred from gand on 10/8/2020.]
September 29, 2020 Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (eop) [Transferred from gand on 10/8/2020.]
September 25, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Johan Carlos Gamez Castillo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. [Transferred from gand on 10/8/2020.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CASTILLO v PAULK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOHAN CARLOS GAMEZ CASTILLO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mr. PAULK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?