MORGAN v. WARD et al
SHEM O MORGAN |
SHAWN EMMONS, SCOTT CRICKMAR, ROBERT TOOLE, TIMOTHY C WARD, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, TIMOTHY RISER and AARON PINEIRO |
7:2021cv00033 |
March 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
HUGH LAWSON |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Letter from Plaintiff regarding retaliation due to filing cease and desist documents. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sbd) |
Filing 4 NOTICE Georgia Open Records Act Request by SHEM O MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Indigency, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Envelope)(sbd) |
Filing 3 Letter from Plaintiff to the Court requesting a stamp filed copy. Copy of docket sheet mailed to Plaintiff reflecting document was filed with note to include self addressed stamped envelope for copies to be returned. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sbd) |
Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (sbd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT - Notice to Cease and Desist against SCOTT CRICKMAR, SHAWN EMMONS, AARON PINEIRO, TIMOTHY RISER, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, ROBERT TOOLE, TIMOTHY C WARD filed by SHEM O MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Exh. A - Affidavit of Plaintiff, #2 Verification, #3 Special Religious Request, #4 Cover Letter)(sbd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/22/2021: #5 Certificate of Service, #6 Envelope) (sbd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.