BAYNARD v. REGISTER et al
ADJURE BAYNARD |
ZACHERY REGISTER and CATHY HELMS |
7:2021cv00112 |
August 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
W LOUIS SANDS |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE directed to Petitioner. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 10/19/2021. (TQL) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Adjure Baynard. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rlw) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned - Notice of Deficiency sent to Adjure Baynard returned as undeliverable. Documents remailed to Petitioner's new address. (rlw) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address by Petitioner.(rlw) |
Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (rlw) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus Filed by ADJURE BAYNARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(rlw) |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Motion for Writ of Mandamus filed by ADJURE BAYNARD ); Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, every pleading, written motion and other papers must be signed by a party personally if the party is unrepresented. You must refile your signed document within 21 days from the date of this notice. Failure to comply with this notice may result in dismissal of your case by the Court.(rlw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.