THOMAS v. HARDY et al
| LARRY LEE THOMAS, JR |
| Judge JAMES E HARDY, MARGARET CHUPARA, JEANETTE JONES and EVERLYN T JACKSON |
| 7:2021cv00142 |
| October 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| HUGH LAWSON |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Transfer Case to Albany Division Filed by LARRY LEE THOMAS, JR.(rlw) |
| REMARK: Rule 4 service package mailed to plaintiff. (rlw) |
| Filing fee Paid: IFP Denied $402.00, receipt 42783. (rlw) |
| Filing 3 Letter from Plaintiff requesting Hon. Judge Leslie Abrams Gardner be appointed to his case. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rlw) |
Filing 2
ORDER directing Plaintiff to pay the Court's mandatory filing fee or file an appropriate motion to proceed IFP. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 11/1/2021. (aks)
|
| NOTICE RE FILING IN PROPER DIVISION: Your documents were sent to a division other than the division where your case is pending. Although not required, in order to expedite filing we recommend you send documents to the division where your case is pending. Please send all future documents to: U.S. District Court, 401 N. Patterson Street, Suite 212, Valdosta, GA 31601.(rlw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by LARRY LEE THOMAS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rlw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
