MULLINS v. COMBELLE et al
| CARL J MULLINS |
| HOWARD COMBELLE, CONSTANT YOUNG, CAPTAIN CLIFTON and JYOLI PARIKH |
| 7:2022cv00013 |
| February 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| HUGH LAWSON |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee Paid: Initial Partial Filing Fee $14.00 (vs) |
Filing 6
ORDER for Plaintiff to Amend Complaint, granting #2 & #5 Plaintiff's Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and denying #4 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF on 3/11/2022. (TQL)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by CARL J MULLINS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(sbd) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by CARL J MULLINS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(sbd) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (sbd)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by CARL J MULLINS. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement, #2 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(sbd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CLIFTON, HOWARD COMBELLE, JYOLI PARIKH, CONSTANT YOUNG, filed by CARL J MULLINS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sbd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
