MCLEOD v. DEWEY
Plaintiff: JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant: MIKE DEWEY
Petitioner: ROBERT BRUCE
Case Number: 7:2022cv00028
Filed: March 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: HUGH LAWSON
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RESPONSE filed by MIKE DEWEY re #1 MOTION for Temporary Restraining OrderMOTION for Preliminary Injunction (KEMP, JASON)
April 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Second Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #4 Response to Motion filed by MIKE DEWEY ); Document must be converted into text-searchable PDF format and re-filed. See CM/ECF Administrative Procedures, page 9.(rlw)
April 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Motion Hearing set for 5/18/2022 01:30 PM in Valdosta before US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON. NOTICE OF SETTING HEARING ON MOTION re #3 MOTION to Intervene, #1 MOTION for Temporary Restraining OrderMOTION for Preliminary Injunction, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Hearing will occur IN-PERSON. Counsel, parties, and members of the public and press should review Standing Order 2022-03, available on the courts website, regarding courthouse entrance procedures due to COVID-19. (nop)
April 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RESPONSE filed by MIKE DEWEY re #1 MOTION for Temporary Restraining OrderMOTION for Preliminary Injunction (KEMP, JASON)
April 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #4 Response to Motion filed by MIKE DEWEY ); Document must be converted into text-searchable PDF format and re-filed. See CM/ECF Administrative Procedures, page 9.(rlw)
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to Intervene by ROBERT BRUCE filed by LOUIS KOPPEL POLONSKY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - McLeod Motion TRO Brooks Superior, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - McLeod Motion Recusal Judges Brooks Superior, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Complaint, Brief, Rule Nisi & TRO Brooks Superior 22CV-00054)(POLONSKY, LOUIS)
March 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by JERRY MCLEOD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rlw)
March 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Filed by JERRY MCLEOD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(rlw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCLEOD v. DEWEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JERRY MCLEOD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MIKE DEWEY
Represented By: JASON KEMP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ROBERT BRUCE
Represented By: LOUIS KOPPEL POLONSKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?