MCLEOD v. CHAPMAN
| JERRY MCLEOD |
| TRACY CHAPMAN |
| ROBERT BRUCE |
| 7:2022cv00081 |
| August 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| HUGH LAWSON |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT dismissing the case. (ksl) |
Filing 5
ORDER dismissing without prejudice #1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and TRO; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot #4 Motion to Intervene. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 10/6/2022. (aks)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Intervene by Robert Bruce filed by LOUIS KOPPEL POLONSKY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Motion to Revoke McLeod Bond in Magistrate Court of Brooks County)(POLONSKY, LOUIS) |
| Filing 3 EXHIBIT 1-A - Ante Litem Notice by JERRY MCLEOD re #1 MOTION for Preliminary InjunctionMOTION for Temporary Restraining Order. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(sbd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JERRY MCLEOD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sbd) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Filed by JERRY MCLEOD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(sbd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
