NEGRIN v. MYERS et al
| ERIC M NEGRIN |
| Warden MYERS, Deputy Warden MARCUS, Deputy Warden DAVIS, Chief Counselor ANDERSON, Counselor BINGHAM, Admin Officer PICKETT, Admin Officer PIERCE and Warden BEASLEY |
| 7:2022cv00136 |
| December 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| HUGH LAWSON |
| W LOUIS SANDS |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Filed by ERIC M NEGRIN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(rlw) |
| NOTICE RE FILING IN PROPER DIVISION: re #4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Your documents were sent to a division other than the division where your case is pending. Although not required, in order to expedite filing we recommend you send documents to the division where your case is pending. Please send all future documents to: U.S. District Court, 401 N. Patterson Street, Suite 212, Valdosta, GA 31601.(rlw) |
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (rlw)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by ERIC M NEGRIN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(rlw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by ERIC M NEGRIN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rlw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
