STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY v. FEDRICK et al
| STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY |
| TORRII SHAREKA FEDRICK, PHIL LAMAR FEDRICK, JR., PHIL'NESIA LASHASE FEDRICK and A. I. F. |
| 7:2023cv00129 |
| November 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| HUGH LAWSON |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons Phil Fredrick, #2 Summons Phil'Nesia Fredrick, #3 Summons AIF)(ksl) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY identifying Corporate Parent StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. for STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY. (POHLMANN, AARON) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4512139, $402 filed by STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Group Policy, #2 Exhibit B - Death Certificate, #3 Exhibit C - Indictment, #4 Exhibit D - Beneficiary Statement, #5 Exhibit E - Proof of Death Claim Form, #6 Exhibit F - May 25, 2023 Letter, #7 Exhibit G - Fax, #8 Exhibit H - Letters, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Summons to Torrii Shareka Fedrick, #11 Summons to Phil Lamar Fedrick, Jr., #12 Summons to PhilNesia Lashase Fedrick, #13 Summons to A.I.F. (a minor))(POHLMANN, AARON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
