FROST v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
| GREGORY LERON FROST |
| GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, JUDGE RICHARD M COWART and JULIA BAUN |
| 7:2023cv00142 |
| December 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| HUGH LAWSON |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT dismissing case. (ksl) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing case as frivolous. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 1/3/2024. (aks)
|
| Filing 5 HIGH PREROGATIVE WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH re: Case #2015UR1565 by GREGORY LERON FROST. (ksl) Modified from Notice to Affidavit on 12/28/2023 (ksl). |
| Filing 4 HIGH PREROGATIVE WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH re: Case #2018UR1226 by GREGORY LERON FROST.(ksl) Modified from Notice to Affidavit on 12/28/2023 (ksl). |
| Filing 3 HIGH PREROGATIVE WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH re: Case #2021UR1631 by GREGORY LERON FROST.(ksl) Modified from Notice to Affidavit on 12/28/2023 (ksl). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by GREGORY LERON FROST.(ksl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by GREGORY LERON FROST (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of status, #2 Affidavit of fact, #3 Violation Warning, #4 Lawful Notice)(ksl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
