ESCO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
| WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER ESCO |
| MARTN J O'MALLEY |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE) |
| 7:2024cv00042 |
| April 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF |
| W LOUIS SANDS |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Consent to proceed before a full-time U.S. Magistrate Judge in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in 28 U.S.C 636(c)(1) and (2) (BURGESS, ANJEL) |
| Filing 5 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER ESCO. (ksl) |
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (ksl)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER ESCO filed by ANJEL F BURGESS.. Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(BURGESS, ANJEL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (IFP) against MARTN J O'MALLEY filed by WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER ESCO (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Local Rule 9.2 Social Security Identification Form)(BURGESS, ANJEL) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint (IFP) filed by WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER ESCO ); This filing does not reflect the e mail address of the filer. Please do not re-file, for future reference only. See Fed.R.Civ.P 11.(ksl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
