Bryant et al v. Jones et al
| Michael Bryant, John Drake, Becky Kelley and Herbert Lowe |
| Vernon Jones, Marilyn Boyd Drew, Morris Williams and Richard Stogner |
| Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. and Kristy Bryant Yule |
| 1:2004cv02462 |
| March 12, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| William S. Duffey |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
420
ORDER denying without prejudice 398 Joint Motion to Strike or for Judgment on the Pleadings to the renewal of the Motion after the trial of this action. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. on 3/17/10. (jdb)
|
|
Filing
407
OPINION and ORDER granting Plaintiffs Bryant, Drake and Kelley's 354 Motion for Reconsideration; granting Kristy Bryant Yule's 397 Motion to Substitute Party; granting in part and denying in part Defendant Stogner's 256 Motion fo r Summary Judgment; granting Defendant Stone's 257 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part Defendant Jones's 259 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part Defendant Drew's 262 Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting in part and denying in part Defendant Williams's 263 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Stone remains dismissed from this matter. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr. on 3/12/2010. (dfb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
