North American Medical Corporation et al v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc. et al
| 1:2006cv01678 |
| July 14, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Unassigned |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
921
ORDER AND OPINION denying as moot 859 defendant Gibson's Motion for Extension of Time; granting plaintiff's 861 Motion for Sanctions Against Axiom; denying plaintiff's request for an award of attorney's fees in 861 Motion fo r Sanctions; denying defendant Gibson's 868 Motion to Seal Document and for Sanctions; granting as unopposed plaintiff's 880 Motion for Extension of Time; denying plaintiff's 882 Motion to Cancel Attorney's Lien; denying as moot 883 Motion to Expedite Hearing and Ruling; granting attorney Richard O'Donnell's 885 Motion to Intervene; granting attorney Richard O'Donnell's 892 Motion to Seal Declaration; denying defendant Gibson's 908 Motion to Disclose Settlement Documents. Signed by Judge Julie E. Carnes on 9/19/11. (ekb)
|
|
Filing
617
ORDER granting 459 Motion to Dismiss. Terminating Timothy Exarhos as dft to this case. Signed by Judge Jack T. Camp on 4/9/09. (rsh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: North American Medical Corporation et al v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
