Importers Service Corporation v. Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc.
Importers Service Corporation |
Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc. |
Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc. |
Importers Service Corporation |
1:2007cv00745 |
April 2, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Atlanta Office |
XX US, Outside State |
J Owen Forrester |
Trademark |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 OPINION and ORDER.The court DENIES AS MOOT the parties' motions to seal. The parties are directed to retrieve the deposition transcripts from chambers. The court notes that if any party desires to supplement the record on appeal, that party may file without seal excerpted portions of those depositions which presumably would not contain unnecessary confidential information. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 8/24/09. (bse) |
Filing 89 OPINION and ORDER granting Defendant's 56 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting Defendant's 82 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages and granting Plaintiff's 86 Motion to Strike 83 Reply to Response to Motion. The instant order resolves Plaintiff's complaint, but leaves outstanding Defendant's counterclaims. The court DIRECTS the parties to file a Pre-Trial Order within 30 days of the date of that order. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 8/24/09. (bse) Modified on 8/24/2009 to add text (bse). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.