Crosslink Orthopaedics, LLC et al v. Synthes (USA) Ltd.
| Crosslink Orthopaedics, LLC and Christopher Lockett |
| Synthes (USA) Ltd. |
| 1:2007cv00844 |
| April 17, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| De Kalb |
| J Owen Forrester |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2007. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Entry of Dismissal approving #3 Plaintiff Crosslink Orthopaedics, LLC's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice pursuant to LRCP 41(a)(1)(i). (rth) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (rth) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice filed by Crosslink Orthopaedics, LLC (D'Cruz, Robert) |
| Clerk's Entry of Dismissal approving #2 Plaintiff Christopher Lockett's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(i). (rth) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice filed by Christopher Lockett (Fellner, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Crosslink Orthopaedics, LLC and Christopher Lockett; and Summon(s) issued. Consent form to proceed before U.S. Magistrate and pretrial instructions provided. ( Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number 563880.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A#2 Summons #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(epm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
