Moye v. Coleman Security Systems et al
| Deidre C. Moye |
| Coleman Security Systems and Alpha Protective Services, Inc. |
| 1:2007cv01321 |
| June 7, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Clayton |
| Gerrilyn G. Brill |
| G Ernest Tidwell |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 37 Motion for Reconsideration. An attorney, Mr. Coleman or another attorney eligible to practice in this Court, must enter an appearance in this case on behalf of Defendant. If by September 24, 2009 an attorney has not filed a noti ce of appearance on behalf of Defendant that adopts Defendant's prior filings, the Court may recommend that the clerk enter a default against Defendant. In the event that no attorney files a notice of appearance on behalf of Defendant, the Cler k of the Court is DIRECTED to resubmit this matter to the Court at the expiration of the above-allotted time period. In her 37 Motion, Plaintiff seeks an extension of time to file a proposed pre-trial order. The Court will address this issue, if necessary, upon the appearance of an attorney on behalf of Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerrilyn G. Brill on 9/11/2009. (tcc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
