Mak v. Argent Mortgage Company, LLC et al
Cecilia C. Mak |
Argent Mortgage Company, LLC and Bank of America Corporation, N.A. |
United States of America |
Bank of America Corporation, N.A. |
Argent Mortgage Company, LLC and United States of America |
1:2007cv02806 |
November 13, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Atlanta Office |
Gwinnett |
Forrester |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2410 Quiet Title |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 128 OPINION and ORDER. The court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's 100 motion to dismiss, add party, appoint special master; GRANTS Argent Mortgage's 101 motion for an extension of time to file response; DENIES Argent Mortgage's 113 motion for reconsideration; DENIES Wachovia Mortgage's 114 motion for reconsideration; and DENIES Amy and Floyd Brooks's 118 motion for reconsideration. Clerk is DIRECTED to enter final judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 11/24/09. (bse) |
Filing 110 ORDER denying Argent Mortgage's 55 Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTING Bank of America's 75 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING AS MOOT Mak's 89 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING AS MOOT the Government's 91 Motion to Strike and Motion for Extension of Time to respond ; and DENIES Bank of America's 98 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Substitute Party, Motion for Appointment of a special master. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 9/15/2009. (gar) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.