Walker v. Freeman et al
| Scott Walker |
| Myron Freeman and Donald Spears |
| 1:2007cv03155 |
| December 19, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Macon |
| Batten |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING Defendant Sheriff Myron Freeman's 19 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant Freeman is DISMISSED as a Defendant in this action. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 7/7/2009. (alc)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER AND OPINION. The instant pro se civil action is ALLOWED TO PROCEED as any other civil action. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff the USM 285 form, summons, and initial disclosures form, to be completed as outlined in the order, and retur ned within 20 days from the entry date of this order. Upon receipt of forms, the Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare a service waiver package for each Defendant. Should a Defendant not return the Waiver of Service form to the Clerk within 35 days of the da te the service waiver package was mailed, the Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare and transmit to the USM a service package for said Defendant, for service by USM. The case shall proceed on a 4 month discovery track. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 1/9/2009. (alc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
