Criswell v. Intellirisk Management Corporation, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Vicki Criswell
Defendant: Intellirisk Management Corporation, Inc. and Allied Interstate, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2008cv01686
Filed: May 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: Fulton
Presiding Judge: Tidwell
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 115 OPINION AND ORDER that Defendants' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law 112 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is GRANTED with respect to: (1) Plaintiff's claim for damages stemming from Defendants' alleged breach of her sto ck option agreement, and (2) Plaintiff's claim for attorneys' fees based upon allegations that Defendants have been stubbornly litigious. It is DENIED with respect to: (1) Plaintiff's claim for liability on her breach of contract cla ims based upon the Statute of Frauds and promise of future compensation and (2) Plaintiff's claim for attorneys' fees based upon allegations that Defendants acted in bad faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court defers consideration of D efendants' arguments that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law because: (1) Plaintiff failed to present legally sufficient evidence to support a claim for damages from the alleged failure to pay her the bonuses to which she claims she is entitled; (2) there was no meeting of the minds; and (3) the contract is a nullity. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 4/15/2015. (anc)
April 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 97 OPINION AND ORDER that Defendants' Motion in Limine 93 is GRANTED with respect to the introduction of Other Litigation evidence in Plaintiff's case-in-chief, and opening or closing statements at trial. Plaintiff, however, may request to introduce Other Litigation evidence if evidence introduced after Plaintiffs case-in-chief supports a request to admit Other Litigation evidence. If Plaintiff intends to introduce Other Litigation evidence in rebuttal or to impeach, Plaintiff must provide notice to the Court of her intention to do so to permit the Court to consider the request outside the presence of the jury. Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 4/1/2015. (anc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Criswell v. Intellirisk Management Corporation, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vicki Criswell
Represented By: David M. Lilenfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Intellirisk Management Corporation, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Todd Van Dyke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allied Interstate, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Todd Van Dyke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?