Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. et al v. M.L.M. et al
| JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. and Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Investment Savings Plan |
| Douglas Morgan and M.L.M. |
| 1:2008cv01821 |
| May 21, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Fulton |
| Forrester |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 Interpleader Action |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
OPINION and ORDER dismissing Plaintiffs from case for purposes of discovery. The court retains jurisdiction over Plaintiffs to the extent it will have to direct them as to the proper person entitled to the 401(k) account and for their claim to attor ney's fees. The court REALIGNS the parties: M.L.M., a minor, by her guardian Teresa Quinn-Vesely or Mark Robert Vesely, is now the Plaintiff in this case and Douglas Morgan is the Defendant. The court notes that at least one party to the litigat ion has requested mediation. The court is amenable to appointing a United States Magistrate Judge as mediator so long as all parties consent. The court notes that Douglas Morgan had filed a cross claim against Defendant Teresa Quinn-Vesely. The court approved his 19 consent dismissal without prejudice of that cross claim. For that reason, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Defendant's 8 Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claim. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 12/10/08. (bse)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
