Miller et al v. Conway et al
Avery Lamar Miller |
R. L. Conway and Fergurson |
1:2008cv02271 |
March 8, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Atlanta Office |
Thomas W. Thrash |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 84 ORDER granting 74 Motion for Summary Judgment, denying 79 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 11/3/10. (dr) |
Filing 62 ORDER AND OPINION granting 56 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 3/8/10. (dr) |
Filing 36 ORDER AND OPINION that Plaintiff shall be obligated to pay the full stautory filing fee of $350.00 as funds are deposited in his inmate account; granting 35 Motion to Add Party, A. J. Craig, and Daniel Porter added to case; granting in part an d denying in part 32 Motion for Service, Defendants Craig, Porter, and Land are DISMISSED, and GRANTED as to Defendants Conway and Ferguson; granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Amend; granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Clarification, to clarify that the retaliation claims against Land have been dismissed; granting 34 Motion to Dismiss, Defendants E. McKenzie and H. Breitinger are DISMISSED. Plaintiff is directed to complete and return USM 285 form and summons for Conway and Fergurson within 20 days. Clerk to prepare a service waiver package. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 11/6/09. (dr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.