Plymouth County Retirement System v. Carter's Inc. et al
| Plymouth County Retirement System |
| Carter's Inc., Frederick Rowan, II, Joseph Pacifico, Michael D. Casey and Charles Whetzel, Jr. |
| 1:2008cv02940 |
| September 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Fulton |
| Forrester |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER denying with leave to renew Defendants' 29 Motion to Dismiss. Because the court has consolidated this case with 1:09-cv-3196, all future filings should be made in the earlier filed case, Plymouth County Retirement System, Civil Action No . 1:08-cv-2940-JOF, with the caption "In re Carters Securities Litigation." The proposed Amended Complaint will serve as the new starting off point for this litigation. In conjunction with the filing of the amended complaint, the parties are DIRECTED to submit to the court a proposed scheduling order. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 1/15/10. (bse)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 17 Motion and APPOINTS Plaintiff as lead plaintiff in this matter and Plaintiff's chosen counsel as lead and liaision counsel. Signed by Judge J. Owen Forrester on 3/13/09. (bse)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
