INFINITE ENERGY INC v. CHANG
Plaintiff: INFINITE ENERGY INC
Defendant: Thai Heng Chang
Counter Defendant: INFINITE ENERGY INC
Counter Claimant: Thai Heng Chang
Case Number: 1:2008cv03201
Filed: October 22, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Atlanta Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Pannell
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 229 ORDER GRANTING 221 Emergency MOTION to Transfer Case to to the Northern District of Georgia filed by INFINITE ENERGY INC; DENYING 227 Emergency MOTION to Stay filed by INFINITE ENERGY INC. Signed by JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 10/7/2008. (jws) [Transferred from Florida Northern on 10/22/2008.]
October 1, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 225 ORDER EXPEDITING RESPONSE from THAI HENG CHANG to 221 Emergency MOTION to Transfer Case to to the Northern District of Georgia filed by INFINITE ENERGY INC. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 10/3/2008).) Signed by JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 10/1/2008. (jws) [Transferred from Florida Northern on 10/22/2008.]
September 12, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 215 ORDER GRANTING re 177 MOTION to Amend Affirmative Defenses filed by INFINITE ENERGY INC; 179 Amended Document filed by INFINITE ENERGY INC accepted as timely filed; DENIED as Moot re 175 MOTION to Strike Affirmative Defenses and Memorandum of Law filed by THAI HENG CHANG. Signed by JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 9/12/2008. (jws) [Transferred from Florida Northern on 10/22/2008.]
September 9, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 214 ORDER DENIED as to 187 Emergency MOTION to Sever; GRANTED re 206 MOTION for Leave to File file Memorandum; GRANTED re 207 File Exhbits Under Seal and 208 Exhibits accepted as timely filed; DENIED re 211 MOTION to Strike. Signed by JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 9/9/2008. (jws) [Transferred from Florida Northern on 10/22/2008.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: INFINITE ENERGY INC v. CHANG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thai Heng Chang
Represented By: Stan Cushman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: INFINITE ENERGY INC
Represented By: Adamson Bennett Starr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: INFINITE ENERGY INC
Represented By: Adamson Bennett Starr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Thai Heng Chang
Represented By: Stan Cushman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?