NCI Group, Inc. v. Cannon Services, Inc. et al
| NCI Group, Inc. |
| Goldin Industries, Inc., Jack Goldin, Martin C. Goldin, Lonnie A. Carroll, Steven R. Byers, Darrell L. Coots, Randy W. Froehlich, Cannon Services, Inc., Gary M. Goff and Lorri M. Coker |
| Darrell L. Coots, Gary M. Goff, Cannon Services, Inc. and Lorri M. Coker |
| NCI Group, Inc. |
| Lonnie A. Carroll, Cannon Services, Inc., Gary M. Goff and Darrell L. Coots |
| Lonnie A. Carroll, Randy W. Froehlich and Steven R. Byers |
| 1:2009cv00441 |
| February 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Martin |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
260
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 232 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend. The motion is GRANTED as to the proposed allegations of general and specific jurisdiction over the Goldins and supporting facts. The motion is also GRANTED a s to the amendments dropping Plaintiff's negligence claims and removing the dismissed Defendants from the complaint. The motion is DENIED as to all other proposed amendments-namely, the proposed additional RICO count and additional facts in supp ort of the alleged Goldin Secondary Scheme. Plaintiff's Rule 56(d) Motion 221 is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion to Correct Scrivener's Errors 252 is DENIED as moot. The Goldin Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 217 is DENIE D with the right to refile. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file its Second Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this Order and, concurrently with the Second Amended Complaint, a Notice specifically identifying the paragraph s of the Second Amended Complaint containing the permitted amendments. The Goldins shall have fourteen (14) days from the date the Second Amended Complaint and Notice are filed within which to file an Amended Answer. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 11/16/11. (cem)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER GRANTING 77 NCI's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and to Add Parties; DENYING AS MOOT 48 the Goldin Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING 51 Mr. Byers's Second Motion for a More Definite Statement; GRANTING 56 NCI&# 039;s Motion to Dismiss Defendant Lonnie Carroll's Counterclaim for Cost of Defense; GRANTING 64 NCI's Motion to Dismiss Defendant Darrell L. Coots's Counterclaim for Cost of Defense; GRANTING IN PART 83 Mr. Byers' Motion for Stay of Further Proceedings as to Him Until Further Order of the Court; GRANTING IN PART 90 Mr. Carroll's Motion for Stay of Further Proceedings as to Him Until Further Order of the Court; GRANTING IN PART 97 NCI's the Motionto Stay Dis covery for Ninety Days for All Parties; DENYING 99 the Goldin Defendants' Motion to Dismiss NCI Group, Inc.'s Amended Complaint; GRANTING 101 the Goldin Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Briefing Exceeding Court's Page Limi tation; GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART 109 the Goldin Defendants' Motion to Strike a Portion of NCI's Reply and Bar NCI From Referring to Certain Immaterial Matters; and GRANTING 112 and NCI's Motion for Leave to File Brief Exce eding Court's Page Limitation. The current proceedings are hereby ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATED. NCI is ORDERED to provide the court with a status report at the end of 90 days indicating whether the case is ready to proceed. NCI may seek to reopen the proceeding at any time by filing a motion to that effect. Signed by Judge Beverly B. Martin on 8/4/09. (tcc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
