Terrell v. OTS, Inc. et al
| Candace Terrell |
| Charlton Carlos Lester and OTS, Inc. |
| 1:2009cv00626 |
| March 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| De Kalb |
| Story |
| Walker |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
ORDER denying 149 Defendant's Motion for Renewed Judgment as a Matter of Law or alternatively, New Trial. GRANTS 170 Defendants' Motion to allow the withdrawal of Attorneys, Louis R. Cohan and Matthew Robert Rosenkoff. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 7/1/11. (cem)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER reserving ruling on 94 Defendants' Motion to Amend theConsolidated Pre-Trial. The Court will allow Defendants to make a proffer outside the presence of the jury, if they so choose, to establish the admissibility of each intended witness testimony. The Court will better be able to determine the admissibility of the evidence in that posture. However, Defendants Motion in Limine Barring Plaintiff from Using Legal Conclusions from Eliciting or Producing Evidence of Hyperbaric or Oxygen Chamber 113 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 3/25/11. (cem)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER granting 92 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude Defendants Use of or Reference to the Existence or Content of any Documentation, including Tape Recordings, Relating to Other Complaints that was not Produced in Discovery. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 3/9/11. (cem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
